Japan Press Weekly
|Japan Press Service Co., Ltd. is the only news agency providing information of progressive, democratic movements in Japan|
50 years of Japan-US Alliance
Priority given to military operations over any sense of justice
gJapan did enter into an informal agreement that it would waive its primary right to exercise jurisdiction except in cases of especial importancef to Japan, and Japan has faithfully carried out this understanding.h This is a quote from gUnited States Forces in Japan: A Bilateral Agreementh co-written by Dale Sonnenberg and other authors.
Very short notification period given to Japan
As gprocedures used within Japan to maximize US jurisdiction,h this article touches on the following issues: a) non-indictments; b) US investigation of crimes involving alleged US perpetrators; c) lapse of time to provide a notice of intent to indict; and d) if necessary, waivers of cases already under indictment.
Category b) indicates that the U.S. side takes control of the investigation of crimes involving its servicemen and restricts Japanfs investigation. In 2008, U.S. military police transported two family members of military personnel from the spot where they had allegedly committed theft to a U.S. base. This case has raised the question of how Article 17 of the SOFA should be interpreted.
What does category c) suggest?
The Japan-U.S. joint committeefs 1953 gagreed official minutesh regarding Article 17 of the SOFA designates that if Japan fails to advice the U.S. side within a set period of time whether it will exercise its jurisdiction over the crimes committed by U.S. military personnel, the U.S. can exercise such right. The periods or time set for Japan are very short, for instance: five days (revised to ten days in 1960) after the date of original notification of alleged offense for ones gpunishable under Japanese law by confinement for 6 months or lessh such as trespass, assault, and driving while drunk; and 20 days after date of original notification of alleged offences gpunishable under Japanese law by confinement for more than 6 months.h
gThis arrangement was imposed in order to ensure the implementation of the secret agreement in which Japan renounces its jurisdiction,h said journalist Yoshida Toshihiro in his recent book titled gSecret pacts - Japan-U.S. SOFA and crimes committed by U.S. military personnel.h
Guarantee military operations
The secret document compiled by the Justice Ministry Criminal Affairs Bureau in 1972 blatantly argues that the arrangement was established based on the recognition that the delay in determining how to treat members of the military would interfere with U.S. military operations.
Yoshida says, gCrimes, if committed by civilians, have no time restriction, other than the statute of limitation, which prohibits investigation, indictment, or lawsuit after a certain set time period. The arrangement clearly gives first priority to the military.h
(To be continued)
Copyright (c) Japan Press Service Co., Ltd. All right reserved